Flocculant Selection & Slurry Screening
Compare charge type, product form, dose response and geotextile drainage using a representative sample.
Read moreHome/FlowTex Dewatering Technology • Manufactured in South Africa
Flocculant selection for geotextile dewatering: charge screening, fabric trials, active-dose calculations, preparation, mixing and troubleshooting.
Flocculants & Conditioning for Geotextile Dewatering
Successful conditioning connects the chemical programme to the actual sludge and filter. FlowTex helps define a trial scope that compares unconditioned feed, candidate flocculants and the selected geotextile before full-scale operation.
Specifications & solutions
Compare charge type, product form, dose response and geotextile drainage using a representative sample.
Read moreCalculate dry-solids loading, active-polymer demand and prepared-solution flow using a trial-selected dose.
Read morePrepare the chosen chemical correctly and confirm injection, contact and floc condition at the dewatering container.
Read moreCheck feed, chemical preparation, dose, mixing, fabric and cake behaviour before changing an operating setpoint.
Read moreCompare fabric, conditioning, drainage, solids capture and cake formation before full-scale manufacture.
Read moreProduct selection
Compare the published grades, then confirm the supplied construction and project requirements in the technical submission.
From specification to site
Coagulation destabilises a suspension; flocculation brings particles into larger aggregates. A project may need one, both or neither. Establish the sequence through testing rather than prescribing a coagulant for every feed.
Compare appropriate anionic, cationic and nonionic candidates. Charge density, molecular characteristics and product form influence response. Sludge chemistry and testing determine the choice; mine tailings or sewage labels alone do not select a grade.
Test the proposed Mono, HF woven or composite construction with the conditioned feed. Rapid settling in a jar does not prove suitable drainage through a fabric. Compare early filtrate, drainage over time and retained cake.
Use the same feed sample, known solids content, defined preparation and comparable active-polymer doses. Record controls and dose-response results. Do not choose from floc size alone.
Consider filtrate treatment, residual reagents, receiving-water requirements and the cake disposal route. Obtain the selected product safety and technical documentation; do not describe every polymer as environmentally harmless.

FAQ
No. Test an unconditioned control alongside suitable candidates. Some feeds drain acceptably without conditioning; others need it to meet retention and drainage requirements. The result depends on the actual feed, fabric and operating conditions.
These are possible screening candidates, not universal prescriptions. Select charge type and grade through representative testing, chemistry review and confirmation of the fabric interaction.
Not without review. Active content, density, chemistry, preparation and performance can differ. Compare on an explicit mass and active-content basis and revalidate the programme.
Send the feed, volume, filtrate target, dimensions, location and programme. We will help define the next step.